Research / Disaster Urbanization

The Relationship between Urbanization Policies and Seismicity in Small- and Medium-Sized Cities: An Examination of the Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes

Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli Kentlerde Kentleşme Politikaları ve Depremsellik İlişkisi: Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme

The argument

Its central argument is that the vulnerabilities exposed by a disaster are produced, and too often reproduced in the aftermath, through the policies, planning decisions, and construction practices that shape cities over decades.

Studying disaster therefore means studying urbanization itself: how land is opened to development, how building stock accumulates, and how small and mid-size cities in particular absorb the pressures of growth with limited oversight.

Aim

The project investigates the relationship between urbanization processes and urban policies and earthquake resilience and vulnerability. The goal is to identify the effects of urbanization policies and settlement decisions on earthquake vulnerability in Turkey.

Supported byTÜBİTAK 1001

Cities studied
Antakya

Antakya

Adıyaman

Adıyaman

Elbistan

Elbistan

İslahiye

İslahiye

Gölbaşı

Gölbaşı

The project
Case selection

The earthquakes of 6 February 2023 caused serious destruction in multiple settlements along the fault line, a unique opportunity to examine the relationship between that destruction and urbanization policies. The study comparatively examines 5 of the 14 settlements severely affected by the earthquake: the central districts of Hatay (Antakya and Defne), Kahramanmaraş (Dulkadiroğlu and Onikişubat) and Malatya (Battalgazi and Yeşilyurt), together with Adıyaman, Kilis, Osmaniye, İskenderun, Samandağ, Elbistan, Pazarcık, İslâhiye, Nurdağı, Doğanşehir and Gölbaşı.

These settlements range in population from 680,000 to 40,000 and differ in administrative status and history, especially regarding the relevant building-inspection system. They include metropolitan centers, non-metropolitan urban province centers, counties of metropolitan municipalities, and counties of non-metropolitan provinces with sizable urban settlements. Selection is based on the availability of data; the five will include one metropolitan center, one provincial center, one metropolitan county center, and two smaller towns.

Method

The research design is primarily a mixed-methods approach that expands on the explanatory and sequential characteristics of data-collection methods, giving prevalence to triangulating quantitative findings in light of qualitative findings.

In the quantitative phase, a spatial database based on past and current planning efforts is collected and rasterized as GIS base maps; building patterns at certain intervals are identified from satellite images and maps; the buildings that collapsed during the earthquake and their attributes are mapped; and the inventory of buildings covered by building amnesties is mapped using GIS. In the qualitative phase, supporting data is collected through in-depth interviews with a limited number of experts, and a historical urban-development trajectory is drawn for each settlement. Finally, the patterns of destruction are analysed and the urban policies that increase vulnerability are identified.

Researchers

Bülent Batuman (Principal Investigator)
Olgu Çalışkan (Researcher)
Fikret Zorlu (Researcher)
Hidayet Tağa (Researcher)
Yiğit Acar (Researcher)

BursariesMelis Sözen, Selin Güzel, Diyar Turğut

Field footage

The debris landscape.

Maraş / Elbistan, post-earthquake

This mound shows how the debris produced after the earthquake covers a vast area, revealing the ecological burden of the disaster.

Sub-study group

Post-Disaster Recovery Atlas Working Group.

Alongside the TÜBİTAK project, the Post-Disaster Recovery Atlas Working Group extends the inquiry into how recovery unfolds across the affected region.

About the working group →